Blog - Microsoft .NET, ASP.NET, AJAX and more

Getting ActiveTabChanging Functionality from the AJAX TabControl

by Dave Marini 1/4/2010 8:08:00 PM

I have always considered myself to be quite client-side challenged. Having been soured to the thought of JavaScript by all the browser specific code I used to have to write years ago I swore off it and took to server-side development and never looked back. After a year’s hiatus doing WPF programming, I’ve recently found myself back in the thick of web development with new patterns and technologies at the forefront, namely the MVC framework and the ubiquity of jQuery. Before I begin this post I’d like to say that jQuery is, well, everything that is good about client-side programming in my opinion.

So recently I found the need to roll my own dirty form warning mechanism on a site I was working on. These forms contain quite a lot of fields and so there is gratuitous use of the TabControl from the Microsoft AJAX Control Toolkit. One of the requirements was to alert the user to changes made on one of the tabs and offer the option to save the changes before allowing the user to change tabs. Initially I thought that this task would be a breeze, what with the OnClientActiveTabChanged handler on the TabContainer control and all. Then the sad reality dawned on me. There is no way to cancel the changing of tabs from the client side. Like a freight train full of explosives it barrels on, destroying my workflow and with it any chance I’ll get sleep. But all is not lost, because with a few JavaScript ninja moves, some nifty jQuery (optional) and no personal life there is a clean solution to this problem, So what’s the answer? Read on for the details. More...

Shout it kick it on DotNetKicks.com Bookmark and Share

ObjectDataSource, SOA Style

by Dave Marini 8/18/2008 11:43:00 PM

It's been entirely too long since my last post, and with the olympics in full swing, we'll go with a volleyball theme for this post.


BUMP

So here's the scenario. After really digging your teeth into ASP.NET 2.0 and playing around wiih all the cool data access features, you decide to apply a liberal use of the ObjectDataSource for its ability to take care of the paging and sorting calls for you. Now, you begin to convert your site to a service oriented back end and you wonder how you're going to make calls against your web service. You have a few options in front of you. You can create a thin facade layer that will act as a liaison between your presentation code and your service layer calls, and hook your ObjectDataSource to that. This works especially well when you have a complex object model that makes use of the web service calls behind the scenes. It's also beneficial when you are generating your proxy classes from metadata or contacting a foreign web service. In the scenario I'm going to demonstrate here, I'm referencing a shared contract and service library, so I'll be using using the ObjectDataSource to make direct calls to ChannelFactory<T> for this example.

More...


Shout it kick it on DotNetKicks.com Bookmark and Share
Tags:
Categories: .NET | ASP.NET | C# | Reflection | WCF | Web Services
Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (1) | Comment RSSRSS comment feed

Metadata Exchange Using SvcUtil: A Cautionary Tale

by Dave Marini 3/21/2008 7:42:00 AM


One of the projects that I've been working on the past week is a conversion project that involves a web site that has a tightly coupled business logic layer. The goal of the project is to re-engineer the site so that the business logic and corresponding data access tiers are decoupled and distributed as services. For us the obvious choice for this is using the new Windows Communication Foundation framework to accomplish the task. After some heavy reading and a lot of trial and error, we're very close to having this done and I'm proud of the outcome given the short span of the project (~ 5 weeks). We probably could have finished in 4 weeks if it weren't for a seemingly innocuous problem with proxy generation that ended up costing me 3 day's time to solve.  If you're using a tcp based Metadata Exchange binding and having trouble generating a service proxy with SvcUtil, read on!

The Error Rears It's Ugly Head

This is the error that I was getting when trying to have SvcUtil generate my proxy class for a particular service of mine:

WS-Metadata Exchange Error   URI: net.tcp://localhost:8888/MyServices/MyBigFatGreekService

Metadata contains a reference that cannot be resolved: 'net.tcp://localhost:8888/MyServices/MyBigFatGreekService'.

The socket connection was aborted. This could be caused by an error processing your message or a receive timeout being exceeded by the remote host, or an underlying network resource issue. Local socket timeout was '00:04:59.9843748'.

An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host

Oh how silly of me! As you can see, SvcUtil was built to tell you exactly what's going on, NOT!! this error is terribly vague because it leads you to believe that you have a network issue going on, which hey, you might. But in my case, I had 15 services hosted on the SAME address and I was able to generate 14/15 with no problem. Now, let's take a look at what kind of problems cause this error to appear:

Common Beginner Mistakes

I'm going to take a small digression here to talk about some common mistakes that take 30 seconds to fix that could cause this error to occur.  Most people who get errors from SvcUtil are missing something in the configuration of their services that is causing the problem.  The biggest two culprits I've seen:

1.) Make sure you enable Metadata Exchange. you need to do this explicitly for each service and it's commonly missed. This is done with a Service Behavior Configuration Section, like below. The key piece here is the serviceMetadata element:

<behaviors>
     <serviceBehaviors>
          <behavior name="MetaDataBehavior">
            <serviceMetadata />
          </behavior>
     </serviceBehaviors>
</behaviors>

If you're using a Tcp based binding, just making sure it's there as above enables the exchange. For using an Http based binding, specify either HttpGetEnabled or HttpsGetEnabled, as in the below example:

<serviceMetadata httpGetEnabled="true" />

2.) Make sure that the security settings on your binding match what you want to achieve.  If the discovery of your metadata is to be public, explicitly set your security to "None" so that you are sure not to encounter authentication issues. If not, make sure you configure the security correctly. In my example, we're not securing the metadata endpoint.

<services>
   <service name="Service.MyService" behaviorConfiguration="MyServiceBehavior">
      <host>
        <baseAddresses>
           <add baseAddress = "net.tcp://localhost:8888/MyService" />
        </baseAddresses>
      </host>
      <endpoint address="" binding="netTcpBinding" contract="Service.IMyService" 
           bindingConfiguration="myNetTcp" />
      <endpoint address="mex" binding="netTcpBinding" contract="IMetadataExchange" 
           bindingConfiguration="mexTcp" />
   </service>
</services>
<bindings>
  <netTcpBinding>
     <binding name="myNetTcp" portSharingEnabled="true">
     </binding>
     <binding name="mexTcp" portSharingEnabled="true">
         <security mode="None" />
     </binding>
     </netTcpBinding>
</bindings>

In this case I'm using port sharing because we want all of our services to share the same Tcp port regardless of how many we have in the future. If you have port sharing enabled for one service, do yourself a favor and keep it consistent. For more detailed information about port sharing, read this blog post by Nicholas Allen to get a true understanding of why you need this.

Sleuthing About

None of my other services were having proxy generation problems, so I knew that I had the services set up correctly. I even double checked to make sure I didn't have any syntax errors on that one service that could cause me problems. After this, I began seeing some strange things. Turns out, switching to an Http based binding like mexHttpBinding fixed the problem. But I didn't want http, I wanted Tcp, so I pressed on. What could be the difference between the two bindings that could cause such a problem?

It turns out that the service I had trouble with was the largest of all the services I was trying to generate (~ 30 methods). I found that by commenting out a few of the methods in the service contract, the Tcp Metadata exchange WORKED! It also didn't matter which methods were commented, which ruled out problems like an incorrectly serialized type or a duplicate operation name.  Now, in Juval Lowy's book on WCF, he states that service contracts should have no more than 5 - 7 methods if they are properly factored and this makes sense,  but I didn't have time to factor this class straight away due to time constraints.  For now, the class has to stay big. There was no documentation stating that service contracts had a maximum size restriction, so again, WHY THIS ERROR?

I thought that maybe I needed to up the default throttling controls on the metadata exchange binding for the services, so I increased the maxReceivedMessageSize and all of the limits in the readerQuotas element, but received the same error. It should be noted here that the mexTcpBinding is a very specific type of netTcpBinding that doesn't allow you to tweak these settings. So, just use netTcpBinding, there's no rule against it.

Send In The Marines!

Hey everyone, SvcUtil has a limit on how much metadata it can receive! Did you know that?  If you did, congratulations, because this is not well documented at all! Especially disconcerting is the apparent inconsistency with which this limit is imposed, which was the reason that my mexHttpBinding worked without a hitch. How do we tell SvcUtil to eat more fiber?  It turns out I was on the right track with increasing the throttling controls on the binding, but not in the right place. It turns out that I needed to create an app.config for SvcUtil itself, place it in the directory with SvcUtil.exe and THEN run it. Here's the config that finally made it work:

<configuration>
  <system.serviceModel>
     <client>
        <endpoint name="net.tcp" binding="netTcpBinding" bindingConfiguration="myTcp"
          contract="IMetadataExchange" />
     </client>
     <bindings>
        <netTcpBinding>
            <binding name="myTcp" maxBufferPoolSize="60000000" maxBufferSize="60000000" 
                 maxReceivedMessageSize="60000000" >
              <readerQuotas maxDepth="2147483647" maxStringContentLength="2147483647"
                 maxArrayLength="2147483647" maxBytesPerRead="2147483647" 
                 maxNameTableCharCount="2147483647" />
            </binding>
        </netTcpBinding>
     </bindings>
  </system.serviceModel>
</configuration>

So there it is. Make sure that the binding configuration that you use in the svcutil app.config matches the one you're using in the configuration file for your service host. If you don't, you will be getting a different error when you run SvcUtil, explaining that you have mismatched service settings and therefore the action is invalid.

Roll Credits

I can't say I figured this problem out on my own. In fact, when I was so frustrated that I ripped all my hair out, I finally posted the MSDN Forums to see if ANYONE had the same problem as me. Thanks to the moderators there, I was pointed in the right direction which solved my problem. You can see my post here.

In my next post, I'll be discussing why Visual Studio's Service Reference Proxy Generation Tool isn't adequate for those who are producing and consuming their own services and want to share multiple collection data types between the service and client, and how to use SvcUtil to overcome that inadequacy.

Shout it kick it on DotNetKicks.com Bookmark and Share

Using Exchange Web Services 2007: The Basics

by Dave Marini 3/20/2008 8:02:00 AM
Technorati Tags: ,,

Exchange Web Services (EWS) for Microsoft Exchange 2007 provides a quick an easy way to interface with Exchange data from anywhere without having to interface with ugly COM interop objects if you're living in a managed world like C#.  Today I was curious at how to get calendar appointments from Exchange into a readable format that I can use in another application, perhaps one that synchronizes appointments from exchange with those from other calendaring applications like Google's calendaring feature.  Also, I found the documentation about EWS hard to find and not very helpful, so this post will serve as a single source of good documentation for those who are getting started with EWS.  All of the examples I give will assume you have a basic familiarity with the available operations that the web service offers you.  Here are some great links to get you up to speed:

MSDN Getting Started With EWS: A 3 part intro to Exchange 2007 Web Services.
EWS Operations: A list of the operations that can be performed on the EWS.
FindItem Example in C#: An example of querying calendar items from EWS.
Glen Scales' Blog: This guy knows Exchange inside and out.

The Exchange Web Services module works off the concept of creating a soap message to send to Exchange that will tell the server what you're looking for and then give you back a soap response. The only thing I find to be problematic in the EWS architecture is that the type objects that were used to comprise the API that C# developers will use to create these requests is almost a literal translation of the corresponding XML elements and attributes, which has a tendency of making the code bloated and a bit unintuitive. Regardless, anything is better than using the old ways of communicating with Exchange, so let's continue.

The first step in communicating with Exchange is to obtain a proxy. This is an instance of the ExchangeServicesBinding class. With Visual Studio 2005, you can generate this proxy object by adding a web reference pointed at http://<YourExchangeServer>/EWS/Services.wsdl.  As a user of Visual Studio 2008, I thought that adding a service reference would accomplish the same thing, but it turned out I was wrong. If you attempt to use a service reference to generate these types, you won't get the proxy object back to instantiate.  So, the way to do this is as follows. Right click on your project and choose "Add Service Reference". Then, when the Add Service Reference Dialog comes up, choose "Advanced". This will present you with the Service Configuration Dialog screen. From here, there will be an option on the bottom left to "Add Web Reference" and this will bring you to the screen that will ensure that you generate the appropriate proxy objects from the WSDL. See Figure 1 for some screenshots of this.

Figure 1. Adding a web reference to the exchange services.
ewsConnect

In the case you don't want to go through using a web reference, you can use the wsdl.exe tool to generate the classes that you can then reference in your project. For more information about doing this, go here.  Once you have the proxy, you will want to connect to it in order to post messages to it. The way to do this in C# is quite straightforward:

ExchangeServiceBinding esb = new ExchangeServiceBinding();
esb.Url = "http://<YourExchangeServer>/EWS/Exchange.asmx";
esb.Credentials = new NetworkCredential("username", "password", "domain"); 

Once authenticated, you will be connected to Exchange as the user in the credentials supplied.  You can also use CredentialCache.DefaultCredentials if you are making a WinForms application and want to use the credentials of the logged in user when connecting to the exchange server.  One thing to keep in mind when querying or creating items in exchange from this point is that all of these operations, with the exception of the free/busy time query, work off a single mailbox at a time, and this mailbox is initially that of the connected user.  The solution if you need to see items from other users is to impersonate the target user(s) and perform the queries.  There are 2 ways to accomplish this, one uses delegates and the other explicit impersonation.

Most operations in the Exchange Services proxy take objects that require you to specify which folders you will be working on.  For example, if I wanted to look for messages that contain the subject "happy holidays", I would probably want to look in the inbox, but also in the deleted items folder since I could have deleted the message I'm looking for.  There is a property on the folder type object called Mailbox, and this allows you to specify another person's mailbox when specifying the folder. So, assume I am connected to the Exchange Server as John Smith, but I need to find all appointments in Anne Dugger's calendar folder. Here would be the code to use delegate access to accomplish this:

FindItemType fit = new FindItemType();
fit.ItemShape = new ItemResponseShapeType { BaseShape = DefaultShapeNamesType.Default };
fit.ParentFolderIds = new DistinguishedFolderIdType[]
{ 
    new DistinguishedFolderIdType
    { 
        Mailbox = new EmailAddressType{ EmailAddress="adugger@contoso.com"}, 
        Id = DistinguishedFolderIdNameType.calendar
    }
};
fit.Traversal = ItemQueryTraversalType.Shallow;

FindItemResponseType firt = esb.FindItem(fit);

In the above example, the FindItemType is the class that we use to tell exchange to find items in a particular user's folder. Here we're specifying that we want to look in the Calendar folder of the user that has an email address of adugger@contoso.com. In order to use delegate impersonation to query Exchange, Anne Dugger would have to grant the connected user access to her calendar folder. This can be done in Outlook by going to tools->options and clicking on the Delegates tab. This tab is only visible if outlook is connected to an exchange server.  This method is useful if the functionality you want to incorporate is opt-in as users can grant a particular system account delegate access to their mailbox so that automated tasks can be performed.

The second way to accomplish querying another user's mailbox folders is explicit impersonation. This method is useful for scenarios where an Exchange Administrator wants to force one or more mailboxes to be maintainable by a system account.  The setup for this scenario is a bit more complex and is covered in detail here. Once configured, we can programmatically invoke impersonation in C# through the following means. Using the same example as above, if John Smith's account had been granted impersonation rights on Anne Dugger's mailboxes, and I wanted to find all appointments in Anne Dugger's Calendar folder, here is the C# code we would use:

ExchangeImpersonationType imp = new ExchangeImpersonationType();
imp.ConnectingSID = new ConnectingSIDType { PrimarySmtpAddress = "adugger@contoso.com" };
esb.ExchangeImpersonation = imp;

FindItemType fit = new FindItemType();
fit.ItemShape = new ItemResponseShapeType { BaseShape = DefaultShapeNamesType.Default };
fit.ParentFolderIds = new DistinguishedFolderIdType[]
{ 
     new DistinguishedFolderIdType{ Id = DistinguishedFolderIdNameType.calendar }
};
fit.Traversal = ItemQueryTraversalType.Shallow;

FindItemResponseType firt = esb.FindItem(fit);

As you can see from the code above, there is no longer a need to explicitly specify the mailbox when indicating which folders we will be searching. Instead, we tell the proxy instance that we are impersonating Anne Dugger's account by specifying her email address in the ConnectingSID property of an ExchangeImpersonationType that we bind to the proxy instance.  You can also use the principal name here if you desire, but note that this is may be different than the email address for the target user.

No matter which way you go about getting a user's information, since you can only query one user at a time, you will probably want to employ your favorite threading techniques so that you can get multiple results back in a relatively short amount of time.

Let's talk a bit about shapes.  At least for the FindItem (and perhaps GetItem) service operations, there is a property called ItemShape. This property essentially defines what we expect to come back in the response message from Exchange.  In the above example, We're telling exchange to bring back the default properties for calendar items, but what if we wanted to include a couple of non standard properties in the result? Well, we can specify these in the AdditionalProperties Property of the ItemResponseShapeType class, as in the below example:

fit.ItemShape = new ItemResponseShapeType
{ 
     BaseShape = DefaultShapeNamesType.Default, 
     AdditionalProperties = new PathToUnindexedFieldType[]
     { 
          new PathToUnindexedFieldType{ FieldURI = UnindexedFieldURIType.calendarIsMeeting },
          new PathToExceptionFieldType{ FieldURI = UnindexedFieldURIType.calendarIsRecurring }
     } 
};

The code above specifies that we want 2 custom properties to be returned, one indicating whether the appointment is a meeting and the other to indicate whether the appointment is recurring or not. We can then use these properties in the response should we have any logic for whether or not to process recurring meetings differently than other types of meeting.

Just as an aside, when searching for items in Exchange, you can specify grouping and paging options as well as restriction and sorting options.  I won't go into details about all of these, suffice it to say that the MSDN example in the link above shows all of these aspects of the FindItem operation. 

So that wraps up the basics of how to connect to and impersonate with Exchange 2007 web services.  I've only really played around with it for an hour, and it's pretty obvious that I only really used the FindItem operation since I only needed basic properties to be returned about the appointments I was searching for. For more details about the appointments (like the invitees, etc) I would have to call GetItem on each item that was returned from FindItem, passing the Item's id in as the reference. The API has the ability to do much more than search, I can programmatically create appointments, messages and contacts as well, but the underlying infrastructure is the same as it is for finding an item, so getting an understanding of it for the FindItem operation will translate to other operations as well. 

Shout it kick it on DotNetKicks.com Bookmark and Share

Extending the GridView to Work With the New DataPager Control

by Dave Marini 3/19/2008 7:35:00 PM
Technorati Tags: ,


Recently I read an article by Scott Mitchell about the new ListView and DataPager controls that are included in the .NET Framework version 3.5. This got me curious as to how to adapt other well known databound controls like the GridView so that they can work together with the DataPager control.  After some light reading and rather heavy reflecting over the guts of the GridView control, I had a gameplan and was ready to go.  Extending a databound control to allow communication with the DataPager control isn't too difficult to do, but it does assume that you have an understanding of how the data is bound to the control. But why bother to do this when the GridView has its own paging control built in? Well, for one thing, being able to decouple the pager from the grid allows us to do some pretty cool things. One thing I can think of is having the GridView in the left bar and the paging control someplace in the main window. Also, we can have a grid with two pagers. Each keeps track of the current page consistently, regardless of which one we use to page through our data. Finally, the templating controls of the pager are very powerful compared to those of the GridView by itself.

Let's start with how a databound control can communicate with the DataPager. The DataPager control can be hooked up to any control that implements the IPageableItemContainer interface located in the System.Web.Extensions assembly. Here's a quick shot of what the interface looks like courtesy of .NET Reflector:

public interface IPageableItemContainer
{
    //Events 
    event EventHandler<PageEventArgs> TotalRowCountAvailable;

    // Methods  
    void SetPageProperties(int startRowIndex, int maximumRows, bool databind);

    // Properties 
    int MaximumRows { get; }
    int StartRowIndex { get; }
}

The MaximumRows and StartRowIndex properties of the interface are simply there to create a way for your databound control to determine the data window to display. This effectively defines the basis for what you will consider to be a "Page" of data.  The SetPageProperties method is important in the interaction with the DataPager because this is the method in your control that the DataPager will call whenever you click on any of the DataPagerField controls (The Next or Previous Buttons, for example).  Finally, the interface defines an event called TotalRowCountAvailable.  This event tells the DataPager how many records are in the data being bound to your control. This is obviously important as the DataPager uses the total row count to determine how man page buttons to render or whether to disable the next or previous buttons so that you don't go to a nonexistent page index.

So let's begin extending the GridView with the hooks for the DataPager.  Thinking about the IPageableItemContainer interface in terms of the GridView, we realize that MaximumRows is equivalent to the existing PageSize property, and StartRowIndex can be calculated from the existing PageSize and PageIndex properties.  We also prepare the event by declaring it and creating a corresponding event invoker. Since I want my new Paging capability to be the default for this grid, I force the Pager to hide itself every page load. You can add a toggle to this behavior should you so desire. Finally, we stub out the SetPageProperties method, but we'll leave it blank for now as we'll revisit it shortly. So far our new GridView looks like this:

public class PageableGridView : GridView, IPageableItemContainer 
{ 
     public PageableGridView() : base() 
     { 
          PagerSettings.Visible = false; 
     } 

     public event EventHandler<PageEventArgs> TotalRowCountAvailable; 

     public int MaximumRows 
     { 
          get{ return this.PageSize; } 
     } 

     public int StartRowIndex 
     { 
          get{ return (this.PageSize * this.PageIndex); } 
     } 

     protected virtual void OnTotalRowCountAvailable(PageEventArgs e) 
     { 
          if (TotalRowCountAvailable != null) 
                TotalRowCountAvailable(this, e); 
     }

     protected virtual void SetPageProperties(int startRowIndex, int maximumRows, bool dataBind) { } 
} 

The good news is that we're more than half way there. Now is where things get a bit more complex.  We still need a way to set the control with the pagesize and starting row values based on what the DataPager says we need to display once the user clicks on one of its buttons.  This is where the SetPageProperties method comes into play. Here is a basic implementation that gets the job done:

protected virtual void SetPageProperties(int startRowIndex, int maximumRows, bool dataBind)
{
if (databind)
{   
             PageSize = maximumRows;

             int newPageIndex = (startRowIndex / PageSize);

             if (PageIndex != newPageIndex)
             {
                 OnPageIndexChanging(new GridViewPageEventArgs(newPageIndex));

                 PageIndex = newPageIndex;

                 OnPageIndexChanged(EventArgs.Empty);
             }
}

        RequiresDataBinding = databind;
} 

When the DataPager sends the grid its paging information, the grid needs to set any appropriate params on itself to prepare to bind to the right window of data. The 2 properties that the grid is already equipped to do this with are the PageSize and PageIndex properties. These properties can be calculated from the information sent into the method, so we set them.  Of course, if the Page is being changed, we should probably fire the OnPageIndexChanging event. This means if you aren't binding to a datasource, you'll still need to make sure to handle this event. Finally, we instruct the grid to rebind itself should the DataPager be in the process of binding to data.  This is a basic implementation so you'll want to do any data integrity checks here as well, for example checking to ensure that the new PageIndex and StartRowIndex values are in the valid range.

There's only one thing left to do to complete our integration of the GridView to the DataPager. For the DataPager to render the appropriate number of page buttons, or for it to know when to disable the next or previous page buttons on the pager, it needs to know how many total rows there are. This, coupled with the Page Size, which is specified declaratively on the DataPager itself, help it determine the number of pages that the data source contains. The problem is, this information isn't known to the pager. It is known to the GridView however, and we need to get it from there and pass it on to the DataPager. But when can we be sure that the GridView has this data?  The GridView control inherits from CompositeDataboundControl. This type contains a special variant of the CreateChildControls method that also takes in a property indicating whether the control is being bound to data or simply re-rendered.  A little reflecting shows that the GridView uses this method to bind to its data source. Knowing this, it appears this is the place we will want to inject our trigger for the TotalRowCountAvailable event to be raised. This gets a little complicated because we need to handle the case where we're binding to a datasource manually or using a DataSource Control like ObjectDataSource or SqlDataSource, which have the total row count specified within them. A couple of helper methods are required to ensure we get the right value:

//Gets row count from SqlDataSource and the like... 
private int _GetTotalRowsFromDataSourceObject(IEnumerable dataSource)
{
    DataSourceView view = this.GetData(); if (AllowPaging && view.CanPage && view.CanRetrieveTotalRowCount)
        return base.SelectArguments.TotalRowCount;
    else
        return (PageIndex * PageSize) + _GetSourceCount(dataSource);
}

//Gets the row count from a manually bound source or from a source in viewstate 
private int _GetSourceCount(IEnumerable dataSource)
{
    ICollection source = dataSource as ICollection;

    return source != null ?
         source.Count :
         (from x in dataSource.OfType<object>() select 1).Sum();
}

The _GetTotalRowsFromDataSourceObject method retrieves the total number of records from the DataSource object, if it's available. This depends on a couple of things, such as whether the EnablePaging property was set on the DataSource Control and whether the Object has completed the query operation. Worst case, we return a single page of data and be done with it.  The _GetSourceCount method is used for two particular occasions. First, it's how you get the row count in the event that you bind the grid's DataSource property manually and then call DataBind(). Secondly, this method will also prove useful when the grid is rebinding after a postback to data that is stored in the viewstate. In both cases, we use a little linq to extract the total number of resulting data items (or rows in the case of viewstate) in the datasource. Now let's see how we use these methods to tie it all together:

protected override int CreateChildControls(IEnumerable dataSource, bool dataBinding)
   {
       int baseResult = base.CreateChildControls(dataSource, dataBinding);

       if (dataSource != null)
       {
           int dataSourceCount = (IsBoundUsingDataSourceID && dataBinding) ?
               _GetTotalRowsFromDataSource(dataSource) :
               _GetSourceCount(dataSource);

           OnTotalRowCountAvailable(new PageEventArgs(StartRowIndex, MaximumRows, dataSourceCount));
       }

       return baseResult;
   }

The base control's CreateChildControls method is called first, since the grid uses it to actually do the databinding.  if there isn't any data to bind to, there will not be a reason to notify the pager, so we check to make sure we have data, then determine the number of rows in the source through the above mentioned process.  Finally, we fire off the event with the derived data and then we return the original result so as not to affect any other operations that may rely on it.  We now have a GridView that can be coupled with the new DataPager control.  Here's a sample of markup that we would use to use these controls together on a page:

<asp:DataPager ID="DataPager1" runat="server" PageSize="2" PagedControlID="grid2">
    <Fields>
        <asp:NextPreviousPagerField />
    </Fields>
</asp:DataPager>
<custom:pageablegridview id="grid2" runat="server" autogeneratecolumns="true" allowpaging="true"
        onpageindexchanging="grid2_PageIndexChanging" />

Notice that I don't have to specify the PageSize property of the GridView because the PageSize property on the DataPager will be in control of this value. To ensure this, we could shadow the PageSize property on the grid, but this will suffice for now.  So that's really all there is to it.  For newly created server controls that are bound to data, making these inroads to allow your control to work with the DataPager is pretty simple. For the existing controls, like the GridView, it's just a matter of knowing how the binding takes place and then injecting the functionality someplace where you know the needed values will exist.

Shout it kick it on DotNetKicks.com Bookmark and Share